Focus and Scope
CMR does not charge authors any cost. No publication fee. No submission fee.
The Contemporary Management Research is a double-blind reviewed academic journal. All theoretical, empirical and applied manuscripts will be considered for publication.
The external environment for all enterprises is rapidly changing. Global competition, technology development, global climate change, and many emergent business issues formulate significant challenge to business managers. Thus, the Contemporary Management Research has made a deliberate decision to re-focus its scopes on the recently development of contemporary management. From now on, we encourage scholars to focus their research on the emergent issues rather than traditional issues in business fields. We hope to narrow down the scopes of Contemporary Management Research in order to provide up-to-date knowledge for business management and academic researchers.
The prefer scopes include but not limited to the following topics:
- AI application: Application and impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business management
- CSR/Ethic: Corporate social responsibility and business ethic
- EC: Electronic commerce and mobile commerce
- Fintech application: Application and impact of financial technology in business management
- IS/IT and Internet: Application and impact of advanced IT/IS/Internet in business management
- Marketing: Marketing and consumer behavior in Internet age
- Sustainable: Enduring commitment to environmental principles in business management.
- Technology, entrepreneur and innovation: Business management enabled by technology, entrepreneur and innovation.
- Other contemporary management issues: Contemporary new management issues in all fields
Peer Review Process
Before submitting the manuscript, the author should have his/her paper proofread for grammatical and spelling corrections as well as the readability of the paper.
The Contemporary Management Research is a double-blind reviewed academic journal. Each manuscript would be reviewed by the editor for general suitability. If it is judged suitable, a double-blind review process takes place. Based on the recommendations of the reviewers, the editor then decides whether the article should be acceptable.
The evaluation period is short. Usually we evaluate manuscript within one to two months or less. Please remind us if you do not receive the review results after one month.
It is requested that authors should have their paper checked with a native English speaker colleague or professional for English syntax, grammar, etc before submission. Manuscript with serious writing problems cannot be accepted.
Editor-in-Chief:Chih-Chien Wang, National Taipei University, Taiwan
Executive Editor:Yann-Jy Yang, Chihlee University of Technology, Taiwan
- Duties of Editors
Our Editors, Associate Editors, Editorial Committee Members, and Editorial Staffs (hereinafter referred to as “the editors”) actively work to enhance the quality of the “Contemporary Management Research” Journal (hereinafter referred to as “the journal”). The editors are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted should be published. The editors evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, citizenship, sexual orientation, gender, ethnic origin, religious belief, or political orientation of the authors. The editors must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, editorial committee members, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. Our peer reviewing is blind. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by editors without the express written consent of the authors.
The editors will do their best to anti-plagiarism to make sure the journal is original and no plagiarism/self-plagiarism is allowed.
- Duties of Reviewers
Peer review process of the journal assists the editors in making editorial decisions and may also assists the authors to improve the quality of manuscript. The under reviewed manuscripts must be treated as secret and should not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers should call to the editor’s attention if there is any plagiarism and self- plagiarism issue for the manuscript under review. Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept secret and not used for personal advantage before the manuscript is formally published.
Any reviewer who feels himself/herself unqualified to review the manuscript should notify the editors and excuse himself/herself from the review process.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts which will lead to conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other connections with authors and their affiliated organization/institute/university/company of the papers.
- Duties of Authors
Authors should present an accurate and objective account of the research work. The manuscript should contain sufficient details and references to permit other scholars to replicate the study. Fraudulent, plagiarism, self- plagiarism, or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Authors should not publish manuscripts presenting the same research in more than one journal. Authors should ensure the manuscripts are entirely original.
Proper acknowledgment of the contribution of others must always be given. All those who have made significant contributions to the manuscripts should be listed as co-authors. The corresponding author should ensure that all significant contributors are listed as co-authors of the article, and make sure all co-authors have approved the final version of the manuscripts.
When an author discovers a significant error/inaccuracy in his/her own published articles, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the editors or publisher to correct the articles.